Dear Colleagues, Many thanks to Professor Xiao Rao for pointing out that the reason for the omission of the *biji *王氏談錄 from the 2016 printing of the 全宋筆記, 第三編 v. 3 was because that biji had mistakenly been included twice in the original edition (in volumes 3 of *di san bian *and volume 10 of *di yi bian*). I have had separate confirmation from one of the editors of the *Quan Song wen *that that was the case, so the mystery seems to be solved. What that means for scholars of the Song, however, is that when citing the *Quan Song biji* it will be important to specify not only which *bian* and volume, but also which edition/printing, as the page numbers are not the same. Thanks again to Prof. Rao, and also to Zuo Ya, who has been very helpful in getting back on this listserv! Best, Beverly -- Beverly Bossler Chair, Department of East Asian Studies Professor of East Asian Studies and History Brown University Box 1850 (401) 863-9764 Providence, RI 02912